Who are we; a scientific or a metaphysical relationship ?
The root sci comes from the ancient Latin word scire
which came to be scientia and according to
Wiktionary
is a noun and a verb that means to have knowledge
and understanding. The definition of science originally did not
include theory. Theory is a philosophy about how values react and
reasons what they might result in, which can possibly lead to
a scientific discovery if tested, but
philosophy and
science are separate terms.
- Philosophy [
Merriam-Webster ]
- all learning exclusive of technical precepts and practical arts;
the sciences and liberal arts exclusive of medicine, law,
and theology; the 4-year college course of a major seminary
- archaic: physical science; ethics; a discipline comprising as
its core logic, aesthetics, ethics, metaphysics, and
epistemology
- pursuit of wisdom; a search for a general understanding of values
and reality by chiefly speculative rather than observational means;
an analysis of the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental
beliefs.
Today what we call natural science
used to be called
natural philosophy
in the 17th century. Encyclowiki (
encyclowiki.wikidot.com, retrieved on Dec. 2016)
notes that ever Since classical antiquity science as a type of
knowledge was closely linked to philosophy. In the early modern era
the two words, ‘science’ and ‘philosophy’
were sometimes used interchangeably in the English language
(para.1). Today the word theory has taken the place of the
word philosophy.
In society different kinds of philosophies transpire because there
is choice in an outcome one desires, or a way to achieve it. That
is different possible outcomes are reasoned and embraced depending on
the input of different values that one wants to trust in.
Whereas scientific theory is out to discover an absolute that favors
no one's preferred interests or desired trust. In other words
scientific theory simulates it's out to discover facts which can
be hidden but always reveal themselves under the same conditions,
and allows one to discover a force or entity to an outcome –
something you can depend on that is absolute. It can be proved by
observation that is repeatable under the same conditions, and it
can be demonstrated in an environment solely confined and controlled
by these conditions –usually through an experiment. Knowledge
is acquired and inspires confidence or trust in the reaction of
certain values in that environment or application for a
certain predictable outcome. When knowledge is acquired
then it is truly science; that is it is no longer a theory or
philosophy.
One reason theory has been favored over knowledge is that we cannot
know all the absolutes or variables to every event; we can't know
everything unless we are God. But at the same time we have to know
some absolutes to have a foundation to go deeper into discovery,
which also makes finding out the mystery, mind stretching,
and exciting if you can find something that leads you to the love of
your labor. Also absolute knowledge is observable and is
the reason for education otherwise there is no reason to study
anything, nothing to trust in to make your toil and labor
meaningful. But there is another reason that theory is favored over
knowledge [basic demonstrated truth].
I think you will find at the root of institutionally funded education
there is a denigration of
truth in favor of theory among its experts because death is an
absolute over time in this world, and death takes away one's
pride in self-achievement. Death is a stumbling block to explain
life so one has a tendency to form prejudices toward a theory
depending on how we get worth: what we value in order to find
some kind of glory in life, or in death; a desire which affects
our perceptions and philosophy.
Science Made
Simple, Inc. shows us the method to prove a
hypothesis, and one can see how a prejudice might
deny fact over theory:
An incorrect prediction does NOT mean that you "failed." It
just means that the experiment brought some new facts to light that
maybe you hadn't thought about before. (Scientific method,
Prediction, para.4)
A science fair experiment is only a failure if its design is flawed.
A flawed experiment is one that (1) doesn't keep its
variables under control, and (2) doesn't sufficiently
answer the question that you asked of it.
(Scientific method, Conclusion, para.11)
We see that the experiment is only a failure if its design is
flawed
which is very sound in logic. And how do we know if it is
flawed? Number "(2)" is not as sound in logic and
leaves us with a loop hole if the experiment doesn't
sufficiently answer the question.
One can rely on the theory
because it must be the experiment is flawed. When in reality the
theory and experiment may both be a little off, but at least one
is off, either the experiment or the theory if it doesn't
sufficiently answer the question that you asked of it.
That is why we should never call anything science unless all criteria
are met, and will repeat time after time under the same
conditions. We associate the word science with the word authority
because science means knowledge and understanding.
Theory or philosophy is influenced by interpretations but
science is not,
but science does have its limits, and to those limits we
should stick no matter how great the temptation. Our desires
effect how we interpret our experience today, and through all
history. So our philosophical or theoretical view of science has
always been linked to the metaphysical because knowledge has no value
without a desire being met, and perceptions are influenced by our
desires.
Alchemy: an example of when theory is called science
A person cannot call theory or faith –knowledge,
but faith and knowledge do need each other to discover and validate
what one is experiencing, or if one gets their worth from the
right places and is after the right treasures. Although it is unjust
to enslave the poor it is equally unjust to steal from the rich and
take away one's hard labor especially if they are investing into
those under them in order to produce a product that makes the hard
toil of life more enjoyable within their common boundary. We are
trying to discover something much bigger than money, so keep in
mind we are trying to avoid judging moral issues, but out
discover who or what has our desires and who our gods or God might
be, what we trust in, and if it lines up with
reality — observable science/knowledge.
Jeremiah 17: 9-11
The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond
cure. Who can understand it?
I the Lord search the heart and examine the mind, to reward a
man according to his conduct, according to what his deeds
deserve.
Like a partridge that hatches eggs it did not lay is the man who
gains riches by unjust means.
When his life is half gone they will desert him, and in the end
he will prove to be a fool.
( NIV )
What a person greatly values affects how they see the world;
whatever has the heart effects a person's perception
and how they interpret the world. At one time many ancient peoples
thought the sun was a pure form of gold. Although it is somewhat
obvious the sun is a huge fire-ball in the sky, but if we were
to wipe out all of our preconceived knowledge and understanding
we can see how one might be persuaded to believe the sun
was a form of gold if all we had to go on were looks.
The editors of Secrets Of The Alchemists; Mysteries Of The Unknown
(1990), from Time Life Books augment:
The inhabitants of ancient Peru certainly thought of gold that way:
to the Inca's it was "the sweat of the sun," used to
make everything from fishhooks to ceremonial tiaras. To Hindu sages
it was "the mineral light" a physical token of divine
intelligence. And the Greek poet Pindar, writing in the fifth
century BC, called it "the child of Zeus." Even
today, gold's chemical symbol, AU, derives from the
Latin word "shinning dawn."
( p16 )
Gold is not much more than a pretty rock or type of metal that is not
useful for much mechanically, especially to the ancients. So what
gives gold its power over some people? There seems to be a
subconscious connection between gold and who we value or labor for.
Gold was the first widely accepted form of money, or trust for
security. Today we mainly use it to make wedding rings to symbolize a
valued marriage and love. The question; what or who is it that one
values as an entrustment from heaven?
Although many people in the ancient past did not know exactly how the
unseen elements integrated with nature as we have discovered,
they did recognize that the sun was an energy source and gave light
to the world, some even worshiped the sun, and it was the
reason the ancient Egyptians made their gods from gold. How did these
gods give them worth or fulfill their desires: did they bring them
into reality with true intimate friendships or steal away reality
with imaginary friendships and a flesh fantasy? The priests,
in all religions, were the educators of the ancients but they
ceased obtaining revelation or wisdom, probably due to their self
interests and lack of awe/reverence; to be cherished in a greater
glory is the only reason that what is real and true becomes very
valuable, whether it is a glory that covers you in life, or
a glory that covered you in death, the two basic forms of trust
and influencers of one's perceptions and interpretations.
But regardless around 500BC there was a
secular hunger to
understand and discover how the world was working. The Greeks became
famous for employing structured reasoning called the philosophies and
started the first form of western school the
Akademia, The Academy was founded by Plato in
ca. 387 BC in Athens.
According to one of Time Life Books editors
, Constable (1990), Aristotle also
had definite ideas about the origins of metals, including gold.
Metals came, he suggested, from ‘vaporous
exhalations’ from the sun
(p21).
According to another of Aristotle's precepts all of nature
was, like the human race intent on self improvement. In his
words, Nature and God are working towards an end, striving
for what is perfect. Gold being the most nearly perfect metal,
was the obvious end product to these spontaneous changes. …This
system confirmed the first dictum of Hermetic belief As above,
so below.
…Each of the most important metals, they
believed, belonged to one of the seven known planets.
Lead was equated with Saturn…Mars was iron…Mercury…
associated with the planet of the same name. The moon was silver,
and the sun, naturally was gold. ( Secrets of the
Alchemist; mysteries of the unknown, p21-22)
What is alchemy?
One can begin to understand how heavenly desires made gold seem so
perfect, but was it the right heaven?
The ancients philosophers did not see elements as evolving into a
downward state – dying or breaking down, but evolving to
an upward state: and gold was the obvious end product to these
spontaneous changes.
This "obviousness" was
alchemy's theory {religion or philosophy} and
some useful discoveries were made along the way, but all
the while trying to prove a theory that misinterpreted reality; a
corrupted desire blinded them in their interpretations, or
perceptions. Alchemy, originally called magic, was the
forerunner to chemistry. The ancient alchemists seemed to have
believed the source and unification for all the elements was the
sun, which in their eyes was a pure form of gold. All a magi or
priest had to do was facilitate this evolution, or
transformation toward the divinity and oneness with gold. The reward
or result of this transformation would enable one to lay claim to
everything under the sun as a god, and the key was the
philosopher's stone. Indeed philosophy was the only way it could
happen, and this philosophy did lead to
autocracy which
is an evolution from Aristotle's ideology –
aristocracy. But were they defining chemistry or was chemistry
defining them?
In a contrasting irony modern day astrophysicist and many chemists
theorize a similar correlation; all the elements came from hydrogen
and helium {what the sun is made from} from a void in a Big
Bang? Yet no known explosions, especially from nothing,
organize matter, and not even nuclear explosions put molecules
together – it goes against science; knowledge and understanding.
The Big Bang
is a theory and religious belief where wisdom or divinity
is to become one with a void – having or being absolutely
nothing is pure godliness, which really defines death not life.
Could these perceptions or interpretations be tied into a subconscious
desires? Alchemy's origin goes back to Egypt who was famed
in early metal smelting. Again,
Constable (1990) of Time Life Books explains;
But the most oft-cited candidate for founding genius of alchemy was
Hermes Trismegistus — or Thrice-Great Hermes — who,
according to some versions of the legend, was an Egyptian priest
of the first century AD. Other accounts hold that he was the human
incarnation of Thoth, the god of wisdom and scribe of the
underworld, who came to earth and reigned as pharaoh for
3,226 years. ( Secrets of the Alchemist; mysteries of the
unknown, p19)
As much as 1.4 million pounds of gold was plucked from the
desert, making Egypt the wealthiest and most powerful nation on
earth. …if gold was matter in it's perfect form — a
metallic sunshine, an offspring of the gods — then any
person who learned to create it would certainly take on the
attributes of divinity. The successful alchemist would be wise,
powerful, and quite possibly immortal. ( Secrets of the
Alchemist; mysteries of the unknown, p17)
One attribute common to all religions is to bring paradise back
on earth but some questions arise in defining paradise,
and then who can get God's favor in order to do so. The first
Magi noted correctly that the stars marked a time when paradise was
on earth, and that it would return at a certain age when men
would be reunited with God. During the Age of Aquarius a flood
temporarily cleansed the world of corruption and brought about a
climate change; ended a lush green paradise and started the
clock. Time would be limited for people on earth to decide who they
would give their life to — who's trust they would labor for
in order for a dream from heaven to give birth in reality. Some
mystics today think 2012 is the beginning of this golden age because
in truth the Age of Aquarius is at hand again; the scales
are being weighed and the credit lender has a case with the Judge on
who the gentiles trust {USA is the promised land of the
gentiles}. But in the least it will be the birth of a
foreign child that will labor to bring about the fulfillment of a
dream from heaven because interest, a wedding cup, was
passed to him from the nations. Evolution is really about becoming
one with who inspires your dream and sharing a common interest,
but will it be from the right heaven?
To see an in-depth presentation on this click on
Time and Climate Change when you have spare time.
In the first century AD, Christendom and Islam took on alchemy as
occult belief's intertwined with a common desire,
Among them was the notion that a quaff of liquefied gold could
impart immortality
(Constable, 1990, Secrets of
the Alchemist; mysteries of the unknown, p30).
Bartlett (2007) quotes the spiritual implications of alchemy:
Its Father is the Sun, its Mother the Moon; the Wind carries it
in its womb; and its nurse is the Earth. This Thing is the Father
of all perfect things in the world. Its power is most perfect when
it has again changed into Earth. Separate the Earth from the
Fire, and the subtle from the gross, but carefully and with
great judgment and skill.
It ascends from earth to heaven, and descends again, new
born, to the earth, taking unto itself thereby the power of
the Above, and the Below. Thus the splendor of the whole world
will be thine, and all darkness shall flee from thee.
This is the strongest of all powers, the Force of all forces,
for it overcometh all subtle things and can penetrate all that is
solid. For thus was the world created, and rare combinations,
and wonders of many kinds are wrought.
Hence I am called HERMES TRISMEGISTUS, having mastered the three
parts of wisdom of the whole world. What have I to say about the
masterpiece of the alchemical art, the Solar Work, is now
ended. (Real Alchemy; a Primer of practical alchemy,
2009 Ibes Press: Lake Worth, Florida, p18)
The earth; a nursery to heavenly treasures
In the above quote Hermes is really writing about re-establishing
an authority, and in a sense referring to a resurrection of the
gods which were cast down from heaven during a worldwide
catastrophe; a flood which cracked up the earth and threw it out of
balance ending paradise. Of course gold is the uniting
element and proof of this desire for the gods to reign because gold
was interpreted as coming from the sun. In a nut shell Hermes is
saying the earth is nursing gold; a renewal of the children of the
god – sun. But in reality what are the treasures that God is
nursing in the earth; what was the seed he planted in the garden of
paradise? A perception of reality depends on how one obtains
worth and a metaphysical relationship, and interest to see a
dream come true from heaven.
Ever since paradise ended people have been striving for it to return
or so to speak looking for a new world. Even Columbus discovered the
Americas because he was looking for a way to India; the land of a
green paradise and the fabled ruler of East Asia the Great Khan,
being inspired by Marco Polo's writings. Columbus was not out to
bring the words of life and the love of God to the lost natives he
ran across by pouring out the best of his strength for their
trust, although the gospel was brought over to the natives in
pretense, Columbus was after another treasure.
Historian Humble (1978) narrates from gleaning Columbus's logs:
Sadly, Espanola did not yield the Great Khan of Columbus'
dreams, but it soon disclosed a relatively dense population,
a more developed culture and economy than the explorers had yet
found, and enough gold in evidence to seem promising. Unlike the
islanders at San Salvador, who had come out in eager droves at
the sight of the ships, the people here were elusive, so
Columbus sent a party of sailors ashore to capture a few "in
order to treat them well and make them lose their fear, that
something profitable might be had." (The explorers.
Alexandria, Virginia: Time-Life Books Inc., p69)
Vasco da
Gama was actually the one who reached the Indies and he also
committed great atrocities to obtain riches from paradise
and to find comfort and fame in death, and in the name of
Christianity!
Hernando Cortez went to South America to spread the gospel.
Although under religious pretence he destroyed many pyramid temple
centers but it wasn't the Son of Man that he treasured, and
he started a gold rush for Spain. But there was a change in the
weather because North America was going to be the Promised
Land for the Gentiles, or was what transpired not
destined but a coincidence?
According to Barnes (1998) in 1525:
Hernando Cortes lost the first ship he sent to Mexico in a severe
hurricane, along with its crew of over seventy. Because of the
frequency of hurricanes during the gold, silver and slave
times, it was said that, "a ship was sunk for every
lonely mile of unexplored Florida coast" (Florida's
Hurricane History, The University of North Carolina
Press, p41).
And later in 1715
A fleet of 15 Spanish ships commanded by Admiral Don Juan de
Ubilla, loaded with some 14 million pesos worth of gold,
silver, and jewels; one of which was the flagship Capitana. On
July 31 they encountered a hurricane which took out all ships but one
and lost 700 lives. Perhaps more than any other expedition this
hurricane gave this portion of Florida the nickname "treasure
coast" (p46).
What treasure is God after? Many of the European Christians
from the Old World kept the truth as a secret language and indeed it
was a mystery even to them; it was a
Dark Age and even hidden from them because they were
players. It was a time
when Europe generally didn't have a friendship, glory, or
an interest worth their labor, they were constantly looking to
conquer and enslave within the Feudal system. They preached death as
salvation and being poor as piety as long as they could obtain the
power to own the world ?! Is this a trust from the right
heaven or did they become an enemy to true trust because they crossed
a sacred boundary and mocked the Son of Man for their own glory?
Can a person value life at all if they do not labor for the
love of their life and see death as a curse? If a person is not
enlightened within a real glory bigger than themselves they don't
desire truth and will even pervert it with no conviction. But if they
seek, ask, knock, and find it for real, they will
labor for a true friendship because they are a part of, and also
have something special to offer, in seeing an outrageous and
satisfying dream from heaven give birth into reality.
That's what happened to the
Plymouth Pilgrims who were looking for a new world. They
weren't after a love/slave(s) so they can love them
self and look forward to death, but a real heavenly treasure
and entrustment worth the best part of their
strength/life. So then looking at who or what provided for
them in history, it begs the question, did God put his
treasure into earthen vessels or metal, really! And/or
what is our Father/Creator after? What inspires what we
desire, if we desire anything real at all? Why do people even
think of worshiping an unknown god or even
pretending/faking God, and to impress who? There is a
dark force at work there, there is a joker in the deck.
A person that values what they labor for will seek out a true friend
{inspired by the same glory} providing them what is lacking
because they have reciprocated a common interest worth spending all
they possess into seeing a glorious shared dream become reality.
Trust is a sacred thing when it comes to real heavenly
glories otherwise a person mocks their own life and can't
perceive reality, they become delusionary and as irony would have
it, look for life among the dead. When a person truly has a real
trust from heaven they are not dependent on the world, and indeed
set up a border to ensure independence because they have something
absolute inside that gives them a life
which is worth their best labor to return the interest; a special
entrustment only for those who really, really,
value a real treasure from heaven. It really leads to an
intimate friendship that cherishes their mutual vulnerability,
causing sacrifices to be made to keep the boundary sacred so a dream
based on reality can be conceived free from a love/interest that
is a lie.
When a person really does experience a glory from within a
reality, they will not remain the same, they will evolve,
transform, and be changed because of an inspired heavenly desire.
But is it from the right or true heaven? There are heavenly
inspirations that are not really from heaven. Jean Dubuis (cited
by Bartlett ,2007) plainly states what goal
becomes obvious to a true alchemist; not to invent to make life
easier, not to discover an intimate relationship, but to take
the place of The Creator:
Alchemy is more than just something you do in a
laboratory. It is a spiritual path to enlightenment – to
evolving. It can be thought of as a psycho-physiological
transformation directed by human self-consciousness (p40).
Paracelsus said, You will transmute nothing if you have
not first transmuted yourself
(Real Alchemy; a
Primer of practical alchemy, 2009 Ibes Press: Lake Worth,
Florida, p41).
Alchemy affirms that at the origin, there is consciousness.
Consciousness is the need to Be of the Absolute.
In order to satisfy this need, consciousness created life,
and in order to evolve, life created matter. ( Jean Dubuis as
cited by Bartlett, Real Alchemy; a Primer of practical
alchemy, 2009 Ibes Press: Lake Worth, Florida,
p18-19)
Consciousness and transformation
There are different levels of consciousness, and even today there
is obscurity in how to define
consciousness. When consciousness is more than being
aware of one's own existence it
is linked to a metaphysical relationship. We will attempt to define
consciousness in the context of worth, desire, and love,
because this really is the only way to give consciousness meaning and
colors perception. It can cause an evolution when in the presence of
some kind of glory. Evolution or transformation is about becoming one
within a glory because of a shared desire and affection.
So what is it that needs to be
absolute for consciousness to be a delightful part of life?
Absolute and God are separate terms depending on the
context, so we need to understand why the difference. If God is a
real being he would not need to be absolute because he
would be absolute. All he would have to do is show his Glory and
all would confess in that glorious Light. But needless to say God has
hidden himself and for a reason, he wants his children to trust
in something that will change them in preparation for something
extremely dreadful and wonderfully astounding. So if this really is
the case what needs to be absolute that comes from God, but apart
from God?
But first let's look at consciousness and absolute
from a human perspective, if a person was beautiful and strong
would they need to prove it? I think there could only be two
reasons they would have to, and the person they were proving it
to would reveal what they were conscious off:
-
If one wanted to enslave or demean another person with their grander
wouldn't it cause one to become self-conscious because
they would be trying to prove their
absoluteness really in loving themselves
by taking away the value or freewill of another person in their
vulnerability; and coerced worship really makes darkness
an absolute because of unreal interests — the
lesser cannot satisfy the works of the greater!
-
Or to protect their boundary or border to keep their
interests/betrothed/children from being abused, from
being corrupted or defiled in subjection to unwanted vulnerability
because one loves – trust; not really self-
conscious but conscious of the fruit they bare,
trust is the absolute in this case because trust is
the focus. Trust is the shelter to who they will be intimate and
conscious of, so they can reciprocate each other's valued
interest freely because they are covered, and not
naked/vulnerable before the world.
So if trust should be the facilitator to being conscious of an
absolute, trust requires a shared interest with the freedom to
choose it. And if a person were invited to share in
another's beauty and strength because they had a real and true
interest {valued the other personally and as a fundamental part
to a dream coming true} they would become one and only be
conscious of life from within that intimacy, not focused on
themselves because one is immersed in another's trust/love.
Then REAL and TRUE intimate FRIENDSHIP would be the absolute of
one's consciousness and neither being {consciousness}
is self-conscious because of the interest in the other, and
the fulfilling of reciprocated desires. In a true reality this
vulnerability is always covered by the greater glory for the glory of
fulfilling each other's susceptible desires to see a shared
dream come true.
Children are very aware of
life and being alive when they are covered in their
vulnerability, not really self-consciousness until trust is
broken and offenses committed and then their perspective is darkened.
So then the only conscious that
needs to be absolute
is one that is not absolute because that one is
dying to find worth and are not self-satisfying. This happens
because trust requires a freewill and allows us to test an
interest, even in ourselves, but not without a risk/price
! And when one comes to the point of giving trusting in themselves
away, and seriously considering sacrificing their life willingly
to a REAL higher power and intelligence for a shared interest, a
god for a greater glory in death, or God to have their life or
vulnerability covered from death's poisonous sting to see a
glorious dream come true {a taste of a new world},
one's desires will be enticed by a glory if one values spending
their energy for a real interest. When one is truly hungry
and interest is real, one will be invited to an intimate table
by a Real Spirit distinct of one's self, and if one
highly delights and desires what they tasted, what they digested
will cause a transformation in preparation for a reality.
Evolution is about becoming one through a shared desire
– it is about the future, not about science but about
trust! It's about finding one's identity within a
greater glory and receiving an entrustment with a calling to bear and
nurture fruit by who fathered one's dream from a heaven. Trust is
based on a metaphysical perception, but science and invention
become very meaningful and make sense in this light; discovery becomes
very exciting when one understands there are hidden purposes in
everything.